Rare John Lennon letter to Eric Clapton up for auction
















LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – John Lennon held out the promise he could bring out more musical greatness in legendary guitarist Eric Clapton in a letter that could fetch as much as $ 30,000 when it is sold at auction next month, the organizers of the sale said on Monday.


The signed, hand-written letter by the Beatle, who died in 1980 at the age of 40, is one of a selection from some of the world’s great musicians that will go under the hammer in Los Angeles at the Profiles in History auction on December 18.













In a draft letter dated September 29, 1971, Lennon expressed his respect and admiration for British guitarist Clapton and suggested that they form a band together.


“Eric, I know I can bring out something great, in fact greater in you that had been so far evident in your music. I hope to bring out the same kind of greatness in all of us, which I know will happen if/when we get together,” Lennon wrote in the letter.


The letter will hold special significance for Beatles fans as auctioneer Joe Maddalena said it was widely known that there were problems in the Fab Four’s relationships with each other, and that Clapton had almost become a Beatle.


Clapton played in the Plastic Ono Band, formed by Lennon and Yoko Ono in 1969 before the breakup of the Beatles in 1970. He also played on the George Harrison song “While My Guitar Gently Weeps”, which was on the Beatles’ White Album.


“There was a point in time when George Harrison thought about leaving the band and his replacement was Clapton, so this letter is a link of what could have been,” Maddalena said.


The letter is one of 300 manuscripts and letters from literary, musical and political greats, that will be auctioned from the holdings of an American collector.


“What we know of history is from the written word, without these letters, it would all be verbal. It’s a really unique area of collecting as you’re getting a glimpse into people’s minds,” Maddalena said.


Other highlights include a handwritten letter from George Washington, with a pre-sale estimate of up to $ 300,000, and a Charles Dickens manuscript with an obituary of novelist William Thackeray, expected to fetch between $ 40,000 and $ 60,000.


Also on the auction block is a signed, handwritten letter from German composer Ludwig van Beethoven to Tobias Haslinger, a friend of his publisher, in which the musician discussed the second performance of his Ninth Symphony and the Missa Solemnis, two of his most revered works.


The letter, written in German, is undated, but both the Ninth Symphony and Missa Solemnis debuted in performances in 1824. Because of the rarity of the letter, it is estimated it will sell for between $ 40,000 and $ 60,000.


Other items going under the hammer include a signed letter in Russian by composer Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky, which has a pre-sale estimate of $ 10,000 to $ 15,000, and a letter by composer George Gershwin dated March 24, 1932, in which he compares his compositions “Rhapsody in Blue” and “An American in Paris”.


The Gershwin letter is expected to sell for as much as $ 3,000, according to the auction house.


(Reporting By Piya Sinha-Roy; editing by Patricia Reaney; and Peter Galloway)


Music News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Appeals court questions Arizona’s late-term abortion ban
















SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – A federal appeals court panel on Monday sharply questioned lawyers defending an Arizona law that bans late-term abortions starting at 20 weeks of pregnancy except in medical emergencies, which opponents say is the toughest in the United States.


In San Francisco, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard the case after it blocked the Republican-backed Arizona law from going into effect earlier this year. Three abortion providers challenged the law in court.













The Arizona law bars doctors from performing abortions starting at 20 weeks of pregnancy, except in medical emergencies, and could send doctors who perform them to jail.


The American Civil Liberties Union, which is suing to stop the law, said it was more extreme than similar laws elsewhere, because the way Arizona measures gestation means it would bar abortions two weeks earlier than in other states.


Those states also set the limit at 20 weeks but have different ways to calculate gestation time. Arizona already bans abortions at the point of viability, when a fetus might survive outside the womb, generally at 23 to 24 weeks.


Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, a panel member appointed by former President George H.W. Bush, repeatedly expressed concern that the law might not afford women the opportunity to abort a fetus with birth defects in cases where the defects are not apparent until just before 20 weeks.


He also questioned the need to prohibit abortions at that stage of the pregnancy, especially for fetuses bound to develop “horrible birth defects.”


“They’re basically born into hell and then die,” Kleinfeld said. “I don’t see how the courts could act before viability” of the fetus.


“With due respect, that’s the woman’s problem,” responded David Cole, Arizona’s solicitor general. “She should have made that decision earlier.”


William Montgomery, the attorney for Maricopa County in Arizona who also defended the law before the appeals panel, said new medical evidence showed a fetus has the capacity to feel pain during an abortion at 20 weeks of development.


But Judge Marsha Siegel Berzon called that a “red herring” in terms of the constitutional questions the law raises.


The three-judge panel did not say when it could make a final ruling in the case. The U.S. Supreme Court legalized abortion nationwide in 1973, but has allowed states to place restrictions on the procedure from the time of viability unless the woman’s health was at risk.


In July, days before the 9th Circuit panel blocked the law until it could fully consider the case, U.S. District Judge James Teilborg ruled that the Arizona measure was consistent with limits federal courts have allowed.


Talcott Camp, deputy director of the ACLU reproductive freedom project, said the Arizona law’s exception to allow late-term abortion applies only in immediate emergencies if delay can jeopardize a woman’s life or seriously harm her health.


“The medical emergency exception is truly, horrifically narrow,” she said in a phone interview. “This is a law that allows her to get an abortion only when she is in emergency crisis.”


Aside from Arizona, seven U.S. states have put laws into effect in the past two years banning late-term abortions, based on hotly debated medical research suggesting a fetus feels pain starting at 20 weeks of gestation, according to the ACLU.


(Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis and Cynthia Johnston. Desking by Christopher Wilson)


Health News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Reviving Japan’s Economy With ‘Devil Wives’
















After her son was born, Terue Suzuki moved back to her childhood home on weekdays so she could work while her sister cared for the baby, leaving her husband alone in the house they shared. “It was like a weekend marriage,” Suzuki says of the arrangement 14 years ago. “I had a satisfying job and really wanted to go back to it. In Japan, when a woman chooses work instead of staying at home to look after her husband, she’s called a ‘devil wife.’ ”


To spur the country’s moribund economy, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda aims to boost the proportion of working women aged 25 to 44 to 73 percent by 2020, from 66.5 percent in 2010.Limited day care, peer pressure, and job inflexibility mean Suzuki remains a minority in Japan, where 70 percent of women quit work with the birth of their first child, says Nana Oishi, a professor at Sophia University in Tokyo. In the U.S., about a third of new mothers don’t return to work, according to a 2010 Goldman Sachs (GS) report.













Suzuki, who remains happily married with two children, says she was fortunate to have the support of her husband and employer. The telecommunications company where she works let her switch departments to leave the office earlier and offered shorter hours, though she chose to remain full-time. She moved to her parents’ place in Yokohama after failing to find a day-care center near her home. Her sister quit a temporary job and looked after the baby for six months until an opening came up at a nursery near her parents’ house. Suzuki, now 45, continued with the “weekend marriage” when her second child was born, for a total of eight years.


A Japanese newspaper called her oniyome, popularizing the term devil wife, in an article on flexible office schedules that highlighted her determination to return to work. The phrase gained widespread awareness in 2005 when national television aired an 11-episode drama called Oniyome Nikki, or Diary of a Devil Wife.


In a survey of more than 6,000 couples in Japan in 2010, 70 percent of respondents said mothers should stop work to focus on raising children when they’re small, according to the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. While Japan topped the list of 144 countries for innovation capacity in the World Economic Forum’s latest Global Competitiveness Report, it placed 87th for women’s participation in the labor force, the second-lowest, after Italy, among Group of Seven developed economies.


More than half of the 700 respondents in a survey by recruiter Robert Walters Japan said the main challenge for working women is balancing career and family. And 7 in 10 said starting a family makes a woman less employable. “I wanted to have kids but I kept putting it off because I wanted to gain recognition for my work,” says Yoko Ogata, an employee at a trading company who has no children.


After she married a co-worker, colleagues told her to “be a good wife,” while others told her husband he “shouldn’t make his wife continue working,” she says. In her mid-30s, Ogata started managing small teams, and when she became pregnant, she says, “I wasn’t sure what to do … I was finally being given responsibility to handle projects, and by getting pregnant I worried that people would say, ‘This is why we can’t use women.’ ”


Ogata, now 46, had a miscarriage after coming home late at night during the seventh week of pregnancy. “My husband and mother-in-law were very angry and asked if I hadn’t had a miscarriage on purpose,” she says. Ogata didn’t tell co-workers about the pregnancy or miscarriage, and she and her husband later divorced.


If Japan’s female employment rate rose to match the 80 percent rate for males, the workforce would grow by 10 percent, or 8.2 million people, spurring a 15 percent expansion of gross domestic product, Goldman Sachs economists wrote in a 2010 report called Womenomics. Easing rules, such as outdoor-space requirements for child-care facilities, would help make that happen, says Kathy Matsui, Goldman’s chief Japan strategist and a mother of two. The government can encourage more women to stay in the workforce, she said in an e-mail, “through greater deregulation and better enforcement of rules regarding equal employment opportunity and pay.”


The bottom line: To boost the economy, Japan wants to increase the proportion of young women who work to 73 percent from 66.5 percent.


Businessweek.com — Top News



Read More..

Newspaper discloses new Cameron text messages
















LONDON (AP) — A British lawmaker says he’s asked the country’s media ethics inquiry to consider newly disclosed text messages sent between Prime Minister David Cameron and Rebekah Brooks, the ex-chief executive of Rupert Murdoch‘s British newspaper division.


The Mail on Sunday newspaper on Sunday published two previously undisclosed messages exchanged between the pair, who are friends and neighbors.













Brooks is facing trial on conspiracy charges linked to Britain’s phone hacking scandal, which saw Murdoch close down The News of The World tabloid.


In one newly disclosed message, Cameron thanked Brooks in 2009 for allowing him to borrow a horse, joking it was “fast, unpredictable and hard to control but fun.”


Opposition lawmaker Chris Bryant has asked a judge-led inquiry scrutinizing ties between the press and the powerful to examine the messages.


Europe News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Facebook Survey Asks All the Wrong Questions [HUMOR]
















This evening while I was casually browsing my Facebook news feed, the site asked me if I’d like to take a survey, giving some feedback about my Facebook experience. I’d seen plenty of surveys on Facebook before, but never one from Facebook. I excitedly clicked my approval and began my quest to help improve the service.


[More from Mashable: iPhone Loyalty Wanes After Apple’s Latest Smartphone Release [STUDY]]













It soon became clear the survey was more about making Facebook feel good about itself than actually improving its service (Sample question: “How much fun is Facebook overall?”). The questions were extremely general, and made no reference to any specific features, recent news or the wicked-cool Instagrams I’ve been sharing. Are they even paying attention?


When I asked Facebook about the survey, a spokesperson told me only that, “Facebook runs variations of surveys all the time in order to improve the user experience.” When I asked to see a transcript of the survey questions, she politely refused, probably because Facebook doesn’t want the world to know how banal they are.


[More from Mashable: The Secret of Viral Videos, in One Hilarious Parody]


Well phooey on social networks and their misplaced secrecy, I say! I captured screengrabs of most of the survey questions and compiled them into a gallery, which you can check out below (you can thank me in the comments).


But I think Facebook should see this as a learning experience. If it’s serious about improving its service, it needs to be more direct. Forget the focus-grouped questions about “feelings,” “fun” and “control over privacy” — let’s get to the hard stuff. Here are the questions Facebook should have asked in its survey.


1. Should Facebook increase the size of photos in shared links?


  • Nah, “photos” are a fad.

  • Only for users who like looking at things.

  • Well, it would seem like you’re copying Pinterest, so wait a while and do it on a Friday.


2. How bad was that idea to ask people to pay $ 7 to promote posts in their friends’ news feeds?


  • Facepalm bad.

  • Napalm bad.

  • “When did Zynga start running your business development?” bad.


3. Facebook’s IPO: What’s the first thing that comes to your mind?


  • A huge star collapsing into a black hole.

  • The end of Raiders where that guy’s face melts off.

  • An exquisite vision of the future filled with awesomeness (CEO of Instagram only).


4. How much less respect do you have for Facebook after that ridiculous ad with all the chairs?


  • A bit less.

  • Astronomically less.

  • You know that ocean trench near Puerto Rico? Keep going.


5. Should Facebook just admit that Google+ schooled it with Hangouts?


  • Probably.

  • Not at all — one-to-one Skyping is amazing. It’s 2008, right?

  • I wouldn’t worry too much. Hangouts are a feature I only use all the time.


6. And dude, how drunk with power is Twitter right now?


  • I know, right?!

  • Twitter is so lame. Tagged is totally the future!

  • Twitter is the new Instagram, if Instagram were a spam-filled mess you couldn’t find photos in if you tried.


What other questions should the Facebook survey have asked? Shout out your suggestions in the comments.


Facebook’s Customer Survey


You may see a survey like this one on Facebook. The company says it presents surveys to its users all the time to “improve the user experience.”


Click here to view this gallery.


This story originally published on Mashable here.


Social Media News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Facebook Survey Asks All the Wrong Questions [HUMOR]
















This evening while I was casually browsing my Facebook news feed, the site asked me if I’d like to take a survey, giving some feedback about my Facebook experience. I’d seen plenty of surveys on Facebook before, but never one from Facebook. I excitedly clicked my approval and began my quest to help improve the service.


[More from Mashable: iPhone Loyalty Wanes After Apple’s Latest Smartphone Release [STUDY]]













It soon became clear the survey was more about making Facebook feel good about itself than actually improving its service (Sample question: “How much fun is Facebook overall?”). The questions were extremely general, and made no reference to any specific features, recent news or the wicked-cool Instagrams I’ve been sharing. Are they even paying attention?


When I asked Facebook about the survey, a spokesperson told me only that, “Facebook runs variations of surveys all the time in order to improve the user experience.” When I asked to see a transcript of the survey questions, she politely refused, probably because Facebook doesn’t want the world to know how banal they are.


[More from Mashable: The Secret of Viral Videos, in One Hilarious Parody]


Well phooey on social networks and their misplaced secrecy, I say! I captured screengrabs of most of the survey questions and compiled them into a gallery, which you can check out below (you can thank me in the comments).


But I think Facebook should see this as a learning experience. If it’s serious about improving its service, it needs to be more direct. Forget the focus-grouped questions about “feelings,” “fun” and “control over privacy” — let’s get to the hard stuff. Here are the questions Facebook should have asked in its survey.


1. Should Facebook increase the size of photos in shared links?


  • Nah, “photos” are a fad.

  • Only for users who like looking at things.

  • Well, it would seem like you’re copying Pinterest, so wait a while and do it on a Friday.


2. How bad was that idea to ask people to pay $ 7 to promote posts in their friends’ news feeds?


  • Facepalm bad.

  • Napalm bad.

  • “When did Zynga start running your business development?” bad.


3. Facebook’s IPO: What’s the first thing that comes to your mind?


  • A huge star collapsing into a black hole.

  • The end of Raiders where that guy’s face melts off.

  • An exquisite vision of the future filled with awesomeness (CEO of Instagram only).


4. How much less respect do you have for Facebook after that ridiculous ad with all the chairs?


  • A bit less.

  • Astronomically less.

  • You know that ocean trench near Puerto Rico? Keep going.


5. Should Facebook just admit that Google+ schooled it with Hangouts?


  • Probably.

  • Not at all — one-to-one Skyping is amazing. It’s 2008, right?

  • I wouldn’t worry too much. Hangouts are a feature I only use all the time.


6. And dude, how drunk with power is Twitter right now?


  • I know, right?!

  • Twitter is so lame. Tagged is totally the future!

  • Twitter is the new Instagram, if Instagram were a spam-filled mess you couldn’t find photos in if you tried.


What other questions should the Facebook survey have asked? Shout out your suggestions in the comments.


Facebook’s Customer Survey


You may see a survey like this one on Facebook. The company says it presents surveys to its users all the time to “improve the user experience.”


Click here to view this gallery.


This story originally published on Mashable here.


Social Media News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Dizzying array of media streams spotlight election
















NEW YORK (AP) — The days of watching Election Night coverage on a single television set may soon be a quaint anachronism.


Americans have an array of alternatives for following returns on Tuesday night. Television news divisions are throwing everything they have into the story. People will be able to construct their own media experiences, seek out desired information instead of waiting for it, participate in conversations and hear analysis that reflects their own perspectives or none in particular.













Virtually all of the media organizations covering the election promise an abundance of information available online, from interactive maps that display state-by-state results to data from exit polls.


It’s expected to be a huge night for social media. And news organizations say they will monitor the conversations and have their own journalists actively participate.


Entertainment News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Bypass tops stents in diabetics with diseased arteries
















LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – Diabetics with more than one diseased artery fared significantly better if they underwent bypass surgery than those who received drug coated stents following artery clearing procedures to improve blood flow to the heart, according to data from a five-year study presented on Sunday.


After five years, the bypass group had a lower combined rate of heart attacks, strokes and deaths of 18.7 percent versus 26.6 percent for the stent group in the 1,900-patient study funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.













The result was deemed to be highly statistically significant, researchers said.


Previous studies had demonstrated the superiority of bypass surgery over the use of bare metal stents – tiny mesh tubes used to prop open cleared arteries. Researchers suspected that newer stents coated with drugs to prevent reclogging might negate some of the bypass advantage, but that turned out not to be the case.


“The advantages were striking in this trial and could change treatment recommendations for thousands of individuals with diabetes and heart disease,” said Dr. Valentin Fuster, from Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, who presented the findings at the American Heart Association scientific meeting in Los Angeles.


There was a higher incidence of stroke in bypass patients — 5.2 percent versus 2.4 percent. Stroke is a known risk of the surgical procedure in which a piece of a healthy blood vessel from another part of the body is grafted on to re-route blood flow around a blocked heart artery.


But deaths from any cause were significantly lower with bypass surgery than those who received artery clearing angioplasty and a drug eluting stent – 10.9 percent compared with 16.3 percent. There were also twice as many heart attacks among diabetics in the stent group within five years – 99 vs 48, which Fuster called “very significant.”


More than one million bypass surgeries or stenting procedures are performed in the United States each year and some 25 to 30 percent of those involve diabetics with multiple diseased arteries, researchers said.


If the results of this study alter clinical practice, it could eat into lucrative profits of the companies that sell drug coated stents, such as Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific Corp and Medtronic Inc. Boston Scientific and Johnson & Johnson supplied the stents used in the study, but J&J has since exited the stent business.


Dr. David Williams of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, who was not involved in the study, called the results “very convincing.”


“I think the (treatment) guidelines will recognize this and I do think it will be adopted,” he said.


However, Fuster cautioned that longer term follow-up of patients was necessary.


“We always want to know how long the effects last,” he said. “The gap could begin to close or the results could get better and better.”


(Reporting by Bill Berkrot and Deena Beasley; Editing by Marguerita Choy)


Medications/Drugs News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

‘Start-Ups’: A Lifeless Take on Silicon Valley

























In that so-terrible-it’s-great James Bond film A View to a Kill, the diabolical Max Zorin (Christopher Walken) intends to destroy Silicon Valley by means of a man-made earthquake, giving him a monopoly on semiconductor production. If Silicon Valley resembled anything like what was being shown in the first episode of Bravo’s (CMCSA) new reality series Start-Ups: Silicon Valley, I would gladly have been Mr. Zorin’s henchman. When I’m on my deathbed, I won’t be accepting of my demise. I’ll be angry because I’ll know there are 44 minutes owed to me from 2012, minutes lost to this sham of a show.


Here’s the premise of Start-Ups: A half-dozen not-very-bright young things are living in the Bay Area seeking fame and fortune. They all sort of know each other in that manufactured Bravo way. There’s a nod to the idea that “tech” is the central theme, and venture capitalists and angel investors are the means to a lucrative end, but those terms are heard so rarely that they could just as easily have been “record producer,” “Donald Trump,” or “Alaskan crab boat.”





















Reality shows are not Barbara Kopple productions. But if you’re going to distort the truth, manufacture conflict, and present people shallower than a dinner plate from the Kate Hudson Kitchen Kollection, at least be entertaining about it. At least populate it with grotesque exaggerations of almost-humans that I can laugh at and feel superior to. Right?


Start-Ups doesn’t entirely fail in that last regard. Its characters run the gamut from narcissistic idiocy all the way to petty sociopathy. Our cast includes Ben and Hermione Way, a British brother-sister duo who’ve come to California with a DOA startup that sounds identical to existing products like Fitbit and Nike+ (NKE) FuelBand; Sarah, a self-promoting “lifecaster” who does nothing but crash parties and participate in the vapidly dark art of marketing and promotions; Dwight, a coder who claims he has a “Puritan work ethic for work and partying” (I tried to unpack all the ways that statement was wrong but had a seizure before I could finish); Kim, the ambitious self-hating Midwesterner who saw Glengarry Glen Ross but didn’t get the joke; and David, a plastic surgery addict who once worked at Google (GOOG) and has a none-too-shabby degree from Carnegie Mellon in computer science, but who’s primary purpose on the show is to be naked and gay.


All of these people are in Silicon Valley to … well, it’s not really clear what they’re there for, other than to “make it.” There are passing mentions of business plans, and Ben and Hermione do have a disastrous visit with venture capitalist Dave McClure—including ridiculously staging Hermione being “hung over” and taking a nap under the conference table while waiting for McClure to arrive (these kids are just crazy!). But the other 40 minutes of the first episode are taken up with poolside chats, a toga party, some worthless fight between Hermione and Sarah (not even an actual fight, just the detritus of recrimination), and a lot of drinking. Oh, and Ben had a thing with Sarah once, and Kim likes Dwight, and—oh, who cares?


It’s not just that these people are terrible—terrible can be watchable. Villainy can be delightful. But this crew is like a six-pack of nonalcoholic beer: It’s lousy and doesn’t even get you drunk.


Even the most dreadful reality show can still perform the documentary act of exposing viewers to a world different from their own. It may be altered and goosed and heightened, but watching, say, The Real Housewives of Orange County does in fact show you something about life in Orange County. The problem with Start-Ups is that there’s absolutely nothing that’s reflective of the place and culture that is Silicon Valley. And that’s the final shame of it, because someone could do a really interesting take on the Valley and what’s going on there now. After all, it’s a geographic location that is also shorthand for an industry and a scene. And it’s a scene that clearly has captured the attention of young professionals and, to some degree, the general public.


Certain customs and values in Silicon Valley would be worth exploring. There’s the world of venture capital and the people behind those firms who are, to a point, the gatekeepers of success. There are a fair number of extremely educated people who spend day and night in front of a monitor working on the unglamorous task of coding an application. There are massive efforts to recruit talented engineers. There’s the promise of Croesus-like wealth, though of course most startups are destined to go under. (Oh, and one other thing, Bravo: There are some nonwhite people in Silicon Valley, too.) Not that these elements necessarily make for a good reality show. These shows thrive on drama and conflict and broad personalities you can see a mile away. But they also do give you a sense of place. I watched Start-Ups and felt like I could be sitting through any Real World episode that ever aired.


Start-Ups: Silicon Valley is executive produced by Randi Zuckerberg, Mark’s dilettante sister, whose master plan includes hosting a talk show. When it came to this project, Zuckerberg said her role was to “[help] make sure that Bravo could capture the real, authentic Silicon Valley.” Based on the evidence, it would appear that Zuckerberg uses words like “real” and “authentic” about Silicon Valley the same way Taco Bell (YUM) might toss them in when describing a Meximelt.


31fc8  etc stackside45 405inline Start Ups: A Lifeless Take on Silicon ValleyPhotographs courtesy Bravo/NBC


Businessweek.com — Top News



Read More..

As foreigners go, Afghan city is feeling abandoned

























KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (AP) — By switching from studying business management to training as a nurse, 19-year-old Anita Taraky has placed a bet on the future of the southern Afghan city of Kandahar — that once foreign troops are gone, private-sector jobs will be fewer but nursing will always be in demand.


Besides, if the Taliban militants recapture the southern Afghan city that was their movement’s birthplace and from which they were expelled by U.S.-led forces 11 years ago, nursing will likely be one of the few professions left open to women.





















Taraky is one of thousands of Kandaharis who are weighing their options with the approaching departure of the U.S. and its coalition partners. But while she has opted to stay, businessman Esmatullah Khan is leaving.


Khan, 29, made his living in property dealing and supplying services to the Western contingents operating in the city. Property prices are down, and business with foreigners is already shrinking, so he is pulling out, as are many others, he said.


Many are driven by a certainty that the Taliban will return, and that there will be reprisals.   


“From our baker to our electrician to our plumber, everyone was engaged with the foreign troops and so they are all targets for the Taliban. And unless the government is much stronger, when the foreign troops leave, that is the end,” Khan said.


The stakes are high. Kandahar, Afghanistan’s second city, is the southern counterweight to Kabul, the capital. Keeping Kandahar under central government control is critical to preventing the country from breaking apart into warring fiefdoms as it did in the 1990s.


“Kandahar is the gate of Afghanistan,” said Asan Noorzai, director of the provincial council. “If Kandahar is secure, the whole country is secure. If it is insecure, the whole country will soon be fighting.”


Even though Kandahar city has traffic jams and street hawkers to give it an atmosphere of normality, there are dozens of shuttered stores on the main commercial street, it’s almost too easy to find a parking space these days, and shopkeepers are feeling the pinch.


Dost Mohammad Nikzad said his profits from selling sweets have dropped by a half or more in the past year, to about $ 30 a day, and he has had to cut back on luxuries.


He said that every month he would buy a new shalwar kameez, the tunic favored by Afghan men; now he buys one every other month.


“I only go out to eat at a restaurant once a week. Before I would have gone multiple times a week,” Nikzad said, as he stood behind his counter, waiting for customers to show.


The measurements of violence levels contradict each other. On the one hand, many Kandaharis say things are better this year. On the other hand, the types of violence have changed and, to some minds, gotten worse.


“Before, we were mostly worried about bomb blasts. Now … we are afraid of worse things like assassinations and suicide attacks,” said Gul Mohammad Stanakzai, 34, a bank cashier.


Prying open the Taliban grip on Kandahar and its surrounding province has cost the lives of more than 400 international troops since 2001, and many more Afghans, including hundreds of public officials who have been assassinated by the Taliban.


Kandahar province remains the most violent in the country, averaging more than five “security incidents” a day, according to independent monitors. In Kandahar city, suicide attacks have more than doubled so far this year compared with the same period of 2011, according to U.N. figures.


“They are not fighting in the open the way they were before. Instead they are planting bombs and trying to get at us through the police and the army,” said Qadim Patyal, the deputy provincial governor.


The Taliban have said in official statements that they are focusing more on infiltrating Afghan and international forces to attack them. In the Kandahar governor’s office, armed Afghan soldiers are barred from meetings with American officials lest they turn on them, Patyal said.


And many point out that the “better security” is only relative. By all measures — attacks, bombings and civilian casualties — Kandahar is a much more violent city now than in 2008, before U.S. President Barack Obama ordered a troop surge.


There are no statistics on how many people have left the city of 500,000, but people are fleeing the south more than any other part of the country, according to U.N. figures. About 32 percent of the approximately 397,000 people who were recorded as in-country refugees were fleeing violence in the south, according to U.N. figures from the end of May.


The provincial government, which is supposed to fill the void left by the departing international forces, has suffered heavily from assassinations. It suffered a double blow in July last year with the killing of Ahmed Wali Karzai, the half-brother of President Hamid Karzai who was seen as the man who made things work in Kandahar, and Ghulam Haider Hamidi, the mayor of the city.


Now, Noorzai says, he can neither get the attention of ministers in Kabul nor trust city officials to do their jobs.


He remembers 2001, when he and others traveled to the capital flying the Afghan flag which had just been reinstated in place of that of the ousted Taliban. “People were throwing flowers and money on our car, they were so happy to have the Afghan flag flying again,” he said.


“When we got power, what did we give them in return? Poverty, corruption, abuse.”


Mohammad Omer, Kandahar’s current mayor, insists that if people are leaving the city, it is to return to villages they fled in previous years because now security has improved.


Zulmai Hafez disagrees. He has felt like a marked man since his father went to work for the government three years ago, and is too frightened to return to his home in the Panjwai district outside Kandahar city. He refused to have his picture taken or to have a reporter to his home, instead meeting at the city’s media center.


“It’s the Taliban who control the land, not the government,” Hafez said. He notes that the government administrator for his district sold off half his land, saying he would not be able to protect the entire farm from insurgents. Many believe the previous mayor was murdered because he went after powerful land barons.


Land reform is badly needed, and the mayor is angry about people who steal land, but he offers no solution. Kandahar only gets electricity about half the day. The mayor says it’s up to the Western allies to fix that. But the foreign aid is sharply down. Aid coming to Kandahar province through the U.S. Agency for International Development, the largest donor, has fallen to $ 63 million this year from $ 161 million in 2011, according to U.S. Embassy figures.


The mayor prefers to talk about investing in parks and planting trees. “I can’t resolve the electricity problem, but at least I can provide a place in the city for people to relax,” he said.


The only people thinking long-term appear to be the Taliban.


“The Americans are going and the Taliban need the people’s support, so they are trying to avoid attacks that result in civilian casualties,” said Noor Agha Mujahid, a member of the Taliban shadow government for Kandahar province, where he oversees operations in a rural district. “After 2014 … it will not take a month to take every place back.”


One of the biggest worries is the fate of women who have made strides in business and politics since the ouster of the Taliban.


“What will these women do?” asked Ehsanullah Ehsan, director of a center that trains more than 800 women a year in computers, English and business. It was at his center where Anita Taraky studied before switching to nursing.


“Even if the Taliban don’t come back, even if the international community just leaves, there will be fewer opportunities for women,” he said.


On the outskirts of the city stands one of the grandest projects of post-Taliban Kandahar — the gated community of Ayno Maina with tree-lined cement homes, wi-fi and rooftop satellite dishes.


Khan, the departing businessman, says he bought bought 10 lots for $ 66,000 in Ayno Maina and has yet to sell any of them despite slashing the price,


He recalled that when he first went to the project office it was packed with buyers. “Now it is full of empty houses. No one goes there,” Khan said.


Only about 15,000 of the 40,000 lots have been sold, and 2,400 homes built and occupied, according to Mahmood Karzai, one of the development’s main backers and a brother of President Karzai. He argues, however, that prices are down all over Afghanistan, and that Ayno Maina is still viable, provided his brother gets serious about reform that will attract investors.


“Afghanistan became a game,” he said over lunch at the Ayno Maina office. “The game is to make money and get the hell out of here. That goes for politicians. That goes for contractors.”


He shrugged off allegations that he skimmed money from Ayno Maina, saying the claims were started by competitors in Kabul who assume everyone who is building something in Afghanistan is also stealing money.


He said the money went where it was needed: to Western-style building standards and security.


In downtown Kandahar, a deserted park and Ferris wheel serve as another reminder of thwarted hopes. Built in the mid-2000s, the wheel has been idle for two years according to a guard, Abdullah Jan Samad. It isn’t broken, he said, it just needs electricity. A major U.S.-funded project to get reliable electricity to the city has floundered and generators that were supposed to provide a temporary solution only operate part-time because of fuel shortages.


“The government should be paying for maintenance for the Ferris wheel,” the guard said. “When you build something you should also make sure to maintain it.”


____


Associated Press Writer Mirwais Khan contributed to this report from Kandahar.


Asia News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..